For additional resources, you may want to check out the following websites:
http://newspapers.nl.sg/
Rubrics for Component 1 (Oral interview) - 10%
| 1 | 2-3 | 4 |
Execution of the interview | Interview was conducted in a haphazard manner.
Not much thought has been put into the phrasing of the questions.
| Interview was conducted in an organised manner.
Some thought has been put into the phrasing of the questions.
| Interview was conducted in an organised manner with an obvious underlying theme.
Plenty of thought has been put into the phrasing of the questions.
|
Linkage | Little or no effort has been made to phrase the questions such that they are linked to the research required in component 2. | Some effort has been made to phrase the questions such that they are linked to the research required in component 2. | - |
Clarity of the interview transcript | Information and answers are presented in a disorganised fashion. | Information and answers are presented in a fairly organised fashion. | - |
Rubrics for Component 2 (Background research) - 15%
| 1 -2 | 3 - 4 | 5 |
Writeup on the location of the photograph | Information does not clearly relate to the location of the photograph.
There is little or no detail with little or no evidence of research.
Little or no evidence of effort. | Information relates clearly to the location of the photograph.
There is a good amount of detail with evidence of varied sources of research.
Evidence of good effort put in. | Information relates very clearly to the location of the photograph
There is excellent detail with evidence of usage of numerous sources of research.
Evidence of excellent effort put in. |
Writeup on the period or the era that the photograph is situated in | Information does not clearly relate to the era of the photograph.
There is little or no detail with little or no evidence of research.
Little or no evidence of effort. | Information relates clearly to the era of the photograph.
There is a good amount of detail with evidence of varied sources of research.
Evidence of good effort put in. | Information relates very clearly to the era of the photograph.
There is excellent detail with evidence of usage of numerous sources of research.
Evidence of excellent effort put in. |
Writeup on Significance of the photograph | Information does not clearly relate to the significanc of the photograph.
There is little or no detail with little research.
Little or not evidence of effort. | Information relates clearly to the significance of the photograph.
There is a good amount of detail with evidence of varied sources of research.
Evidence of good effort put in. | Information relates very clearly to the significance of the photograph.
There is excellent detail with evidence of usage of numerous sources of research.
Evidence of excellent effort put in. |
Rubrics for Component 3 (Reflection) - 5%
| 1-2 | 3-4 | 5 |
Individual reflection | Reflection reveals that the student shows little or no understanding on the purpose and objectives of the TfU project.
The student shows little or no effort in documenting his candid personal thoughts on the project.
The student reveals little or no insight.
| Reflection reveals that the student shows some understanding on the purpose and objectives of the TfU project.
The student shows some effort in documenting his candid personal thoughts on the project.
The student has a commendable level of personal insight. | Reflection reveals that the student has shown understanding on the objectives of the TfU project.
The student shows tremendous effort in documenting his candid personal thoughts on the project.
The student demonstrates maturity in his personal insight.
|
Category | 2 pts | 1.5 pts | 1 pt |
Content- Appropriate | The person interviewed and the content researched are appropriate for an Oral History | The person interviewed and the content researched were somewhat appropriate for an Oral History
| The person interviewed had little knowledge of the content and was not an appropriate person for an Oral History |
Questioning Knowledge | Questioning demonstrated a strong grasp of the topic and excellent research into it. | Questioning demonstrated a fair grasp of the topic and good research into it.
| Poor questioning due to poor research and a weak understanding of the content investigated. |
Questions- Effectiveness | Questions were effective and sufficiently open ended to draw out the interviewee. | Questions were somewhat effective and sufficiently open ended to draw out the interviewee. | Questions were not effective and failed to draw out the interviewee.
|
Logical & Orderly | The questions followed and orderly progression and built upon each other. | The questions followed a somewhat orderly progression and built upon each other. | The questions jumped around and were not in an orderly progression.
|
Reflection | The reflection demonstrates ability of the student to question biases, stereotypes, preconceptions, and/or assumptions and define new modes of thinking as a result. | The reflection demonstrates ability of the student to question their own biases, stereotypes, preconceptions. New modes of thinking not evident. | There is some attempt at self-criticism, but the self reflection fails to demonstrate a new awareness of personal biases, etc. |
Total
|
|
|
|
Category | 2pts | 1.5pts | 1pt | Total |
Introduction | - Exceptional introduction that grabs the interest of reader. - Introduction exceptionally researched, extremely detailed and historically accurate with critical evidence from a wide range of sources. | - Adequate introduction that states topic. - Some aspects of paper is researched with some accurate evidence from limited sources. | - Weak introduction of topic. - Limited information. | |
Questions | - Questioning demonstrated a strong grasp of the topic and excellent research into it. - Very relevant. | - Questioning demonstrated a fair grasp of the topic and good research into it. - Fairly relevant. | - Poor questioning due to poor research and a weak understanding of the content investigated. - Irrelevant. | |
Assumptions | - Exceptionally clear, logical, mature and thorough. - Allows room for analysis. | - Clear and logical. - Allows little room for analysis. | - Lacks clear and logical development of ideas. - No room for analysis. | |
Methodology | - Thorough and well thought out. - Sufficient for research. | - Adequate. - Fair Effort. | -Weak. -Either over-ambitious or limited effort. | |
Objectives | - Exceptionally clear, logical, mature and relevant. - Focused. | - Clear and logical. - Fairly focused. | - Somewhat clear and logical. - Lacks focus. | |
Total | | | | |